<> Re: Next Hot sectors for 5 years
----- Original Message -----From: Balaji RajagopalanSent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:52 AMSubject: Re: <<Aiii>> Re: Next Hot sectors for 5 yearsHello Natasha,i would like to know how you traced the two IPs. Technically one originated from Yahoo and the other from VSNL. Even if both senders or both accounts were using VSNL as the broadband provider one would use VSNL proxy server and the other would use yahoo proxy server. I am curious to know which parameter to look for to make the assessment.Attached are the message IPs for both parties.Message IP for Alok Tiwari
Delivered-To: try2xl@gmail.com
Received: by 10.70.62.4 with SMTP id k4cs514855wxa;
Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:40:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.90.31.19 with SMTP id e19mr6781283age.1165848056254;
Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:40:56 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <grbounce-1l2wVgUAAAA6zzgIWpDy6LYstJ92pkqq=try2xl=gmail.com@googlegroups.com>
Received: from py-out-1314.google.com (py-out-1314.google.com [64.233.166.175])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 36si4355181nza.2006.12.11.06.40.56;
Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:40:56 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of grbounce-1l2wVgUAAAA6zzgIWpDy6LYstJ92pkqq=try2xl=gmail.com@googlegroups.comdesignates 64.233.166.175 as permitted sender)
Received: by py-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u10so2068784pyb
for <try2xl@gmail.com>; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:40:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.35.63.2 with SMTP id q2mr883292pyk.1165847950950;
Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:39:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.11.25.35 with SMTP id 35gr16597cwy;
Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:39:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender: thamesmaritime@vsnl.com
X-Apparently-To: aiii@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.36.33.8 with SMTP id g8mr3942868nzg.1165818686009; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:31:26 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <thamesmaritime@vsnl.com>
Received: from fe2.vsnl.net (smtp2.vsnl.net [203.200.235.232]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP idv28si3028441nzb.2006.12.10.22.31.25; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:31:26 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 203.200.235.232 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain ofthamesmaritime@vsnl.com)
Received: from vsnl.net ([172.16.28.40]) by fe2.internal.vsnl.net (vsnl mail server fe2) with ESMTP id<0JA3000D6JCYEV00@fe2.internal.vsnl.net> for aiii@googlegroups.com; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:59:27 +0530 (IST)
Received: from [172.16.28.178] (Forwarded-For: [202.68.159.239]) by store2.internal.vsnl.net (mshttpd); Mon, 11 Dec 200606:29:22 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:29:22 +0000 (GMT)
From: thamesmaritime@vsnl.com
Subject: <<Aiii>> Re: Next Hot sectors for 5 years
To: aiii@googlegroups.com, aiii@googlegroups.com
Message-id: <e2a5b06b55b6.457cfac2@vsnl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_7Ac3pJM9DRCtWT6smuheFw)"
X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)
Content-language: en
X-Accept-Language: en
Priority: normal
X-Google-Approved: rishrich@gmail.com via web at 2006-12-11 14:39:03
Reply-To: aiii@googlegroups.com
Sender: aiii@googlegroups.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Google-Loop: groups
Mailing-List: list aiii@googlegroups.com;
contact aiii-owner@googlegroups.com
List-Id: <aiii.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <mailto:aiii@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <mailto:aiii-help@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://googlegroups.com/group/aiii/subscribe>,
<mailto:aiii-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Message IP for Sane CounselDelivered-To: try2xl@gmail.com
Received: by 10.70.62.4 with SMTP id k4cs451060wxa;
Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:18:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.94.3 with SMTP id r3mr7266244anb.1165774720920;
Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:18:40 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <grbounce-1l2wVgUAAAA6zzgIWpDy6LYstJ92pkqq=try2xl=gmail.com@googlegroups.com>
Received: from wr-out-0304.google.com (wr-out-0708.google.com [64.233.184.245])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d35si7160975and.2006.12.10.10.18.40;
Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:18:40 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of grbounce-1l2wVgUAAAA6zzgIWpDy6LYstJ92pkqq=try2xl=gmail.com@googlegroups.com designates 64.233.184.245 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad (test mode)
Received: by wr-out-0304.google.com with SMTP id 28so752003wra
for <try2xl@gmail.com>; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:18:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.35.128.17 with SMTP id f17mr164949pyn.1165774614863;
Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:16:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.11.60.47 with SMTP id i47gr16583cwa;
Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:16:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender: sanecounsel@gmail.com
X-Apparently-To: aiii@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.35.71.1 with SMTP id y1mr1650449pyk.1165767099319; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:11:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <sanecounsel@gmail.com>
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x46si1210469pyg.2006.12.10.08.11.37; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:11:39 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sanecounsel@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.171 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: good (test mode)
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so1440127ugr for <aiii@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:11:37 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=s5vdzRN+dOjBnT4RzP1rZYnORp/Wvi/upbzuQagfM6aQSV/Lq6fGHppxmvFYnlw2+BRPyHei8ET/LYUXDScXdVLR+FHdKJIsc1HehVHWlHc1FWxvqXT2Iax4BQzRIzY6VLfPxEWepztZCkXRyR8mhm5O0qZaL583/NuKO0/X0wk=
Received: by 10.67.20.3 with SMTP id x3mr8457769ugi.1165767097567; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:11:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.67.30.20 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:11:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <2ff53c010612100811l1387e43es94e25cf2c4dfb5a6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:11:37 -0600
From: "Sane Counsel" <sanecounsel@gmail.com>
To: aiii@googlegroups.com
Subject: <<Aiii>> Re: Next Hot sectors for 5 years
In-Reply-To: <a226b21d0612100629i2f8abe4waf587e73b928157b@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_89978_30261944.1165767097510"
References: <5c7041990612090120r6971f541v98f35092cccedbd7@mail.gmail.com> <a226b21d0612100629i2f8abe4waf587e73b928157b@mail.gmail.com>
X-Google-Approved: rajeevmundra@gmail.com via web at 2006-12-10 18:16:52
Reply-To: aiii@googlegroups.com
Sender: aiii@googlegroups.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Google-Loop: groups
Mailing-List: list aiii@googlegroups.com;
contact aiii-owner@googlegroups.com
List-Id: <aiii.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <mailto:aiii@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <mailto:aiii-help@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://googlegroups.com/group/aiii/subscribe>,
<mailto:aiii-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Regards,Balaji----- Original Message -----From: thamesmaritime@vsnl.comSent: Monday, December 11, 2006 10:29 AMSubject: <<Aiii>> Re: Next Hot sectors for 5 yearsNatasha,Well I am Alok Tewari & my e-mail address is indeed thamesmaritime@vsnl.com . However sanecounsel or Nitin Jain is not my e-mail. I donot know about him using same ip address. Mr.Nitin Jain reading this e-mail please advise howcome you have same IP as mine if what Natasha says is correct ( though I seriously doubt she is correct ) . I always use my name. Some may find it hot others may not. Hardly matters to me.As far as Nifty is concerned I myself have been praying for a substential correction of about 200 points so that it can continue upward journey which it will. This correction makes me feel happy & if it does same to you , then we are on same side.If you think there is going to be civil war in India in 5 years, then it is better you look to shift elsewhere rather than propogating your civil war theory. But where will you go as communism is dead & buried all over the world except few Sitaram Yachuris & that old surd Surjeet Singh roaming around in India. I have no problem with the way Indian economy is growing & am happy to be here today, 5 or 50 years from now .Cheers !!!!!Alok Tewari----- Original Message -----From: Natasha ~~!!!Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 8:19 AMSubject: <<Aiii>> Re: Next Hot sectors for 5 yearshello ,You are Alok Tiwari .You have same ip address with maritime thames on the email .So that address is not so hot now so you have used this email id to get hotter .So i dont think your opinions on nifty will give much upside .In 5 years there will probably be civil war in India and all the famers will be jobless since all the land is going to the multinationals and you will be living on hybrid food.Hot sectors in 5 years , look in a 5-6 month period thats the law of cyles , the hormonics of the markets have chnaged .In 5-6 years the industry cycles will most likely be changed and many will be gone .like your once famous himachal and global.````` Natasha !!!!!!!
On 12/10/06, Sane Counsel <sanecounsel@gmail.com> wrote:FriendsOnce a sector becomes "hot " supply increases leading to subdued pricing power . So as investors we can benefit only if we identify the best players in a hot industry early enough and then have the gumption to get out before supply increases .In that sense there can never be a "hot" sector for such an extended period of 5 years unless the industry has formidable moat/entry barriers.My senses is that from a investor return point of view Media / Pure Biotechnology Companies / Premium Hotel Segment / Top tier IT Companies would remain hot for the next 5 years .Infrastructure / Retail / Food Processing - all these will be in demand but may not give huge upside to Investors .
On 12/10/06, Nitin Jain <nitinj@gmail.com> wrote:definitely..the ancillory industries would grow and will become more professional and quality oriented...infact business like - Cold storage..warehouses...supply chain management systems...and hell lotta software which goes behind this to ensure everything falls in place so that customer gets - value for money...the best part would be - Quality improvement and without much cost increase infact the cost might come down as well...the story is unfolding..and it will take 3-5 years as rajiv said...and once again real-estate/land/property play will be involved and lotta small big co.s individuals who owns land at right place will get rewarded !!lets hope for the best !rgdsNitin Jain
On 12/9/06, RajeevM <rajeevmundra@gmail.com > wrote:Food processing sector.
All the mega retail outlets would need supplies.
and the food processing sector would grow. from its present minuscule size.
it has to.. as people become more "hep" the demand for processed food increases.
local small food retailers would soon feel intense pressure from larger organized stores.
the retail food distribution would need that much more "packaging"... cans, foils, plastics and this is also likely to zoom.
your ideas welcome.
I think this retail revolution is a great step towards stronger nation.
all kinds of dirty, filthy, low grade stuff would get pressured out of existence
and would make people aspire for higher quality.
eyes see better things and mind desires it soon.
--
RajeevM
www.EagleEyeTrade.com
Red Hot Trades, Day After Day.
cell: 0 98608 51052 | yahoo: rajeevmundra
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Regards
Nitin Jain
--
Warm Regards;
`````` Natasha !!!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
~~Your Check List~~
MasterLink: www.tinyurl.com/hycwb
Asian Indices www.tinyurl.com/q4cq5
American Indices www.tinyurl.com/qmkjz
European Indices www.tinyurl.com/ofmcw
Commodity & Currency: www.tinyurl.com/mgxu5
Nifty 50 Charts: www.tinyurl.com/nsgx6
FII & MF Latest: www.tinyurl.com/mao6j
NSE Information www.tinyurl.com/he5en
Crucial Market Data www.tinyurl.com/pwv9g
Indian ADR: www.tinyurl.com/lk7s5
India Commodity: www.tinyurl.com/oyfpg
Rish Trade Picks www.rishtrader.blogspot.com
Group Chat: http://eagleeyedata.googlepages.com/chat.html
Research Reports: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/aiii/files?&sort=date
Reading Resources
Books http://www.4shared.com/dir/1044489/76848ad0/sharing.html
Books http://www.4shared.com/dir/490949/fac1f70f/sharing.html
Manage eMail: http://groups.google.com/group/aiii/subscribe
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home