[Mind's Eye] Re: The Great Global Warming Swindle

It might not be an either/or situation.... Could the "solar flare" theory be
right for that period and the "C02" theory be right for this period?

-----Original Message-----
From: Minds-Eye@googlegroups.com [mailto:Minds-Eye@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Lee
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 7:13 AM
To: Minds Eye
Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: The Great Global Warming Swindle

Heheh soooo are you saying that the experts have it wrong, CO2 does
not cuase global warming?

It causes global freezing instead?

On 14 Mar, 14:07, "Ian Pollard" <ian.poll...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13/03/07, Chris Crosdale <chriscrosd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > It's not about the fluctuation in the percentage (the whole point of
> > the show), but merely quoting the size of the percentage, which is
> > small, that is their purpose in that clip. It is a loose bit of
> > information that is not connected with anything and appears like it
> > was meant to provide an emotional image that C02 is
> > "insignificant"....
>
> Hi ChrisC,
>
> What was shown in full in the programme, however, was that the % of
> C02 in our atmosphere has no increasing affect on temperature. Indeed,
> they showed, from deep ice readings, that the middle-ages experienced
> significantly higher temperatures in a period when mankind was
> producing bugger all C02. When the C02 then began to rise with the
> industrialisation of Britain, we saw some of the coldest winters on
> record.
>
> xxxianxx
>
> --
> "We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!"
>
> -- Vroomfondel

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to Minds-Eye@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to Minds-Eye-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---