photo: 25 new messages in 17 topics

alt.showbiz.gossip
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip

alt.showbiz.gossip@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Congrats libs, YOU FUCKED OVER AMERICA!!!!!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/82397312850cdf6a
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 3:17 am
From: "SyVyN11"

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:457BA2B1.14B5D226@hotmMOVEail.com...
> SyVyN11 wrote:
>>
>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
>> > SyVyN11 wrote:
>> >> <argyle@priest.com> wrote in message
>> >> > On 2-Dec-2006, "SyVyN11" <syvyn11@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> > So, since they voted for dems, they're smart! Thanks!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> they are smart, and they know when people lie to them. You have
>> >> >> two
>> >> >> years
>> >> >> not to betray their trust, something tells me that you are not up
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> their
>> >> >> trust.
>> >> >
>> >> > God knows that I never agree with you but, this time I think you
>> >> > just
>> >> > may
>> >> > be
>> >> > right. I hope we are both wrong, for the country's sake.
>> >>
>> >> Travesky has this fantasy that since dems won, dems can do anything
>> >> they
>> >
>> > Wobbie has this fantasy that I said anything dems can "do
>> > anything you want without retrabution or consenquense" HAHAHHAAHHA
>>
>> Never said you said that. I said that. But, you do believe it. At
>
> Yes you did. It's right up there.
>
>> least Nancy Pelosi does, if she didn't, she wouldn't have proposed that
>> Murtha to be Majority leader and Alceed Haystings to be chairman of the
>> house select committee on intel, after saying that she would run 'the
>> most
>> ethical congress EVER!!'
>>
>> It doesn't matter what you say, it's what you do. She proved it.
>>
>> Never mind you just are not smart enough to understand what I've been
>> saying. And let's throw impeachment out of the mix. Let's focus on
>> immigration. In the first days of this congress, Pelosi has sworn that
>> there will be immigration reform. I'll bet you that it will have
>> amnesty
>> and a path to citizenship, what the american people do not want. But
>> she
>> will do it, because she thinks power is her's by birthright, she doesn't
>> think she will have to answer to the voters (although with her living in
>> San
>> Fransisco, she would win easily). But others in the democratic caucus
>> will pay the price in 2008.
>
> Come back when you can post without lying.

A) FUCK YOU!

B) I'm predicting what will happen. Therefore it hasn't happened yet,
therefore I'm not lying. If it doesn't happen, I'll be wrong. But I
won't be wrong.

Do you get tired defending libs?

>
>> >> want without either question or repercussions from voters. That
>> >> means
>> >> they can raise taxes and the people cannot do anything, they can go
>> >> forth
>> >> with investigation after investigation and the people will be fine,
>> >> they
>> >> can
>> >> prepare us for 'hilary care' and there won't be anything done about
>> >> it.
>> >> We already have proof of this with Pelosi fronting Haystings and
>> >> Murtha
>> >> for
>> >> top jobs in the new congress and ignoring their spotty ethics problem,
>> >> she
>> >> thought she could slide past it, but she couldn't.
>> >>
>> >> She might think that 'the most ethical congress ever' are just words,
>> >> but
>> >> she forgets that the american people will remember those words and
>> >> hold
>> >> her
>> >> to it. Any more missteps and we will have our first lame duck
>> >> speaker
>> >> of
>> >> the house.

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 3:35 am
From: "SyVyN11"

"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:457BAB89.39631408@hotmMOVEail.com...
> SyVyN11 wrote:
>>
>> "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
>> news:45763A46.85F9C729@hotmMOVEail.com...
>> >
>> > You've had another chance to read what you wrote before hitting send,
>> > and
>> > blew
>> > that too!
>>
>> I'm sorry, I didn't know I had to agree with you, mien feurer.
>
> Who said that, snip coward?
>
>> >> And once more, THAT'S WHAT I'VE BEEN SAYING ALL ALONG!!! It was you
>> >> libs
>> >> that were fronting that fantasy.
>> >
>> > Uh, no, that's not what you've been saying. Read what you wrote ;)
>>
>> yes it is jackass.
>
> So you claim, snip coward.

you libs want me to snip, you libs don't want me to snip, PLEASE MAKE UP
YOUR MIND!!!

>
>> > Where are you getting this "do anything you want without retrabution or
>> > consenquense"
>> > nonsense??? Can you actually quote something? No? Then quit whining.
>>
>> not what you say, it's what you do.
>
> Ah, you made it up.

No, I'm guessing what you libs think. It's damaging to my mind to think
like you.

>
>> > Your "realm" is celebreities? HAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAAH
>> >
>> > My realm is America. Too bad you have forsaken it.
>>
>> The difference is that in Alt.Gossip.celebrities, at the end of the day,
>> despite our dissagreements, we are still friends. In the political
>> newsgroups, at the end of the day, we pray for each other's deaths.
>
> Quit your whining.
>

not whining, truth. I pray for your death every night and your long
overdue trip to hell.

>> >> ONE MORE TIME IDIOT!! What does that have to do with the fact the
>> >> democrats wanting (and with Chuckie Rangel in charge of ways and means
>> >> it
>> >> is
>> >> certain) RAISING TAXES THRU THE ROOF!!!
>> >>
>> >> just answer that.
>> >
>> > Gee, it would be nice if you actually PROVE that claim.
>>
>> errr, chuckie had said that several times. Check out The Sean Hannity
>> show, where Chuckie said he would rollback the bush tax cuts, in ensense,
>> raising taxes thru the roof.
>
> I don't see a cite...

nor will you. one, I fall into the cite war with you assclowns and you
still don't agree with facts.

He cannot do anything until the Bush tax cuts expire in 2010. But he will
try. Remember, it's not what you dems say, it's what you want to do.
\

>
>> >> He'll be your 100% surest vote in the congress, every crazy lib idea,
>> >> he'll
>> >> vote for it. If it would benifts republicans, he will vote against
>> >> it.
>> >> He is your boy.
>> >
>> > Wow, what are YOU smoking? Cleanup in aisle 7-11!
>>
>> aww, he calls himself america's favorite liberal. how could you hate
>> that? I can, but I hate him to begin with.
>
> "he calls himself america's favorite liberal" - Another unsubstanitated
> claim!

why you hating on a fellow lib? Yarmuth will be the newest liberal
bonehead when the new congress convenes. He will vote with Pelosi 100%
of the time, no matter what is important to his home district.

Look at www.leoweekly.com for what he says about himself. I'm telling you
about a guy that will vote for everything you want. He is the truest
liberal, A LYING SACK OF SHIT!!!!! Just like you.
>
>> >> When was Tom DeLay tried and senenced?
>> >
>> > His TRIAL is coming up! heh heh
>>
>> when?
>
> The preliminary jockeying is still on.
>
> http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-09-13-delay_x.htm?csp=1
> Posted 9/13/2006 12:37 PM ET
>
> AUSTIN - Texas' highest criminal appeals court said today it would
> consider
> reinstating a dropped conspiracy charge against former House majority
> leader Tom
> DeLay, further delaying his trial on felony money laundering and
> conspiracy counts.
> ...
> Judge Pat Priest said he would proceed with the trial when the appeals
> process has
> been concluded.

when was the trial (SNIPPER)

> ...
>
>> >> they are smart, and they know when people lie to them. You have two
>> >> years
>> >> not to betray their trust, something tells me that you are not up to
>> >> their
>> >> trust.
>> >
>> > Says the celebrity news hound ;)
>>
>> I'll put the IQ of AGC against the IQ of the political newsgroups
>> anytime.
>> Hell, I'll put the most liberal member of AGC's IQ against yours any day
>> of
>> the week.
>
> So, how about that Britney Spears, eh? heh heh

self importance and egotisical, the truest hallmark of a lib.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Lindsay Lohan rumored to be hooked on some pretty dangerous drugs,
including Oxycontin
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/97c625b7a919b26e
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 8:55 am
From: "Carin"

"Gossip Guy" <freestuff19@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165608039.733462.221880@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> The National Enquirer is reporting that Lindsay Lohan may be hooked on
> a dangerous combination of drugs, including Rush Limbaugh's drug of
> choice, Oxycontin. According to a "close friend" that passed a
> polygraph test, Lindsay has been mixing "cocaine and the prescription
> pain medication Oxycontin with vodka"

Egads! I prefer cranberry juice or tonic water!

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 4:22 am
From: "TribuneofRome"

Gossip Guy wrote:
> The National Enquirer is reporting that Lindsay Lohan may be hooked on
> a dangerous combination of drugs, including Rush Limbaugh's drug of
> choice, Oxycontin. According to a "close friend" that passed a
> polygraph test, Lindsay has been mixing "cocaine and the prescription
> pain medication Oxycontin with vodka"
>
> from: http://www.celebslam.com/lindsay-lohan-might-be-a-druggie
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The girl has some serious mental problems, which may not matter if she
keeps taking this shit. Death does seem to cure even the most insane.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Kevin Federling hitting up all parties for free booze and swag
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/64116502bb0edcdb
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 1:05 am
From: "Lili2"

NY POST...PAGE 6

THERE'S a new freebie whore at large, and his name is Kevin Federline.
Britney Spears' ex has been going to any and all parties as long as
there is free booze and swag. His latest stop was Thursday at the
Armani Exchange store in L.A.'s Sunset Plaza, where he picked up
thousands of dollars of A/X duds "to wear to the Armani
Exchange/Details magazine party later that night." Fed-ex and his posse
of grifters arrived in a rented Maybach and proceeded to guzzle down
free liquor and left with a group of "giggling girls."

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Dustin Hoffman is claiming he could have nailed Princess Diana
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/e1e0f4ef8c459b8d
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 8:35 pm
From: alphakitten

Messalina wrote:
> In article <1165714510.983708.298920@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>, Gossip Guy
> says...
>
>>"I happened to be playing tennis in Shepherd's Bush (west London)
>>and she was there and they said, 'Do you want to meet?' "I said,
>>'Sure!' She was very proper until she turned to go and she (looked
>>back over her shoulder and made flirty eyes). "I thought, 'That's
>>my kinda girl.' It's more fun to go through life that way,
>>otherwise there's a lie in the air."
>>
>>more: http://www.celebslam.com/dustin-hoffman-is-53-this-didnt-happen
>>
>
>
>
> Dustin Hoffman is 5' 3"? I knew he was short......but THIS SHORT? Why would a
> gorgeous woman 5' 10" come on to some sadsack looking actor 7 inches shorter?
>
> Mez
>

IMO, Hoffman is sexy (talent, humor and intelligence count for a hell of
a lot) and Di was not remotely gorgeous. <shrug>

~Angel

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 6:31 am
From: "Buttercup"

nimue wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
> > She may been the Paris Hilton of her time.
>
> She wasn't. Not at all. Sheesh, how old are you?
>

Well, Di was more discreet than Paris.
But the gal did get around.

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 4:56 pm
From: "nimue"

Buttercup wrote:
> nimue wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>> She may been the Paris Hilton of her time.
>>
>> She wasn't. Not at all. Sheesh, how old are you?
>>
>
> Well, Di was more discreet than Paris.
> But the gal did get around.

Di was involved in many charitites and humanitarian efforts. She was a
loving mother. She wasn't a walking id like Paris Hilton, who couldn't
remember she left her dog at her grandparents' house.

--
nimue

"As an unwavering Republican, I have quite naturally burned more books
than I have read." Betty Bowers

==============================================================================
TOPIC: "Ugly Betty"changes direction, replaces producer
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/7be49c547002e6b3
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 7:04 am
From: "karl"

"Rob Jensen" <ShutUpRob@aol.com> wrote in message
news:pnmmn2p2klp9dunlgfv87k5a1skfq3q9nq@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 19:51:27 GMT, Guy Bannis <guy@ether.net> wrote:
>
>>In article <eled80$jvm$1@news.datemas.de>,
>> "karl" <kona-karl@hotmail.com> wrote:

>>> I gave Ugly Betty a try when the Earl/Office eps were reruns. I
>>> wouldn't
>>> call it bad. In fact ion many ways it was well done technically. The
>>> problem
>>> is the entire setting just didn't speak to me. It was like a biography
>>> of
>>> someone that is very well written but who's life-story you care nothing
>>> about.
>>
>>I like Salon.com's take on Ugly Betty as the only show now on television
>>about the conflict between the working class and rich people. We used to
>>have Roseanne covering that ground, but now Ugly Betty shows the
>>contrasts week after week.
>
> And, as usual, Salon ignores that Gg has been treading the same ground
> from the opposite direction for seven seasons now and that The OC has
> always at least paid lip service to it.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised that I never had much interest in any of
those shows. As for grouping them as a 'rich vs poor' genre? I'm not sure I
see it.

Roseanne was blue collar all the way from the few eps I did see. Yes there
were 'rich' people but I didn't see it as a 'versus' situation.

GG I've seen maybe 90 seconds of it so I can't say authoritatively but I
thought it was a mother/daughter relationship show.

The OC, I watched the pilot. It didn't seem so much about rich versus poor
as the upper middle class soap with a token outsider: A 90210 clone.

UB seemed to be more about beautiful people versus the plebes - not
'rich/poor' per se.

My 2 cents.

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 7:29 am
From: "vr"

karl wrote:
> "Rob Jensen" <ShutUpRob@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:pnmmn2p2klp9dunlgfv87k5a1skfq3q9nq@4ax.com...
> > On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 19:51:27 GMT, Guy Bannis <guy@ether.net> wrote:
> >
> >>In article <eled80$jvm$1@news.datemas.de>,
> >> "karl" <kona-karl@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> I gave Ugly Betty a try when the Earl/Office eps were reruns. I
> >>> wouldn't
> >>> call it bad. In fact ion many ways it was well done technically. The
> >>> problem
> >>> is the entire setting just didn't speak to me. It was like a biography
> >>> of
> >>> someone that is very well written but who's life-story you care nothing
> >>> about.
> >>
> >>I like Salon.com's take on Ugly Betty as the only show now on television
> >>about the conflict between the working class and rich people. We used to
> >>have Roseanne covering that ground, but now Ugly Betty shows the
> >>contrasts week after week.
> >
> > And, as usual, Salon ignores that Gg has been treading the same ground
> > from the opposite direction for seven seasons now and that The OC has
> > always at least paid lip service to it.
>
> I guess I shouldn't be surprised that I never had much interest in any of
> those shows. As for grouping them as a 'rich vs poor' genre? I'm not sure I
> see it.
>
> Roseanne was blue collar all the way from the few eps I did see. Yes there
> were 'rich' people but I didn't see it as a 'versus' situation.
>
> GG I've seen maybe 90 seconds of it so I can't say authoritatively but I
> thought it was a mother/daughter relationship show.
>
> The OC, I watched the pilot. It didn't seem so much about rich versus poor
> as the upper middle class soap with a token outsider: A 90210 clone.
>
> UB seemed to be more about beautiful people versus the plebes - not
> 'rich/poor' per se.
>
> My 2 cents.

The Gilmore Girls is a class clash show? All I see is annoying banter
between the mother & daughter and a guy who always wears a Mets cap
backwards on his head.

Ugly Betty is a show that takes place in some alternate universe where
people who work in fashion can let themselves go, dress like slobs and
it's somehow okay.

The OC is probably the only decent, unpretentious drama on TV, because
it doesn't pretend that it's not about showing as many hot chicks as
possible to get good ratings.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Can you afford to stay at the worlds best Hotel
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/543662106288ea4b
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 5:26 am
From: "akhtar"

Can you afford to stay at the worlds best Hotel
The place were celebtities stay.The place which is the best in the
world
http://www.hotel-burj-al-arab.blogspot.com

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Jen says Vince got a monster cock
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/c30f11c9bf76764e
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 2:12 pm
From: Agent Smith

"puzzlr" <puzzlr@usa.net> wrote in
news:5Lieh.1425$Gr2.5@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net:

>
> "Agent Smith" <agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote in
> message news:Xns9892EF784F6C4agentsmithtwoblockso@207.115.17.102...
>> "puzzlr" <puzzlr@usa.net> wrote in
>
>> I have a suspicion that this may have been the session with full
>> frontal photos Gwynnie. I just saw some new ones, with a guy in a
>> long towel, whose face I can't make out. But he looked like he had
>> his hand on her vagina from behind.
>
> Now, those I haven't seen. Who was the guy and did she have a mooee
> coming out? With her its always about the publicity.

When it's a vagina, that's the only thing that matters.

>> Do you have any of the Schwarzenegger pix? His is even smaller.
>
> I don't recall his pictures. They did little tommie cruise, Stallone
> and Antonio Bandaras, screen shots. However, I do know that Ahnold is
> very small.

How do you know how big Ahnold is, if you haven't seen the pic?
Stallone made a porno, but since when are there photos of Banderas?

>>> I had the misfortune to get involved with a guy with a huge dick
>>> (fucking circus freak).
>>
>> Oh stop it. Not a day goes by where you don't wish you had a folder
>> full of 8x10's, so you could boast to your girlfriends. But what
>> you'd really like is 6x10 foot poster on the biggest wall in your
>> living room. Admit it.
>
> Nope. I don't want to see either monster again (him or his huge
> dick).

So the big dick had a big dick, huh? Has this made you a small penis
afficionado?

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 4:44 pm
From: "puzzlr"

"Agent Smith" <agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98955DBFFC6F7agentsmithtwoblockso@207.115.17.102...
> "puzzlr" <puzzlr@usa.net> wrote in

>> I don't recall his pictures. They did little tommie cruise, Stallone
>> and Antonio Bandaras, screen shots. However, I do know that Ahnold is
>> very small.
>
> How do you know how big Ahnold is, if you haven't seen the pic?

Its common knowledge since he whipped it out on film.

> Stallone made a porno, but since when are there photos of Banderas?
>

All the Playgirl photos were screenshots.

>> Nope. I don't want to see either monster again (him or his huge
>> dick).
>
> So the big dick had a big dick, huh? Has this made you a small penis
> afficionado?

Didn't say that. I'm just not a size queen.

Puzz

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Tenderness **Nothing to Spoil**
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/9f7b265246577e83
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 2:24 pm
From: PorchMonkey4Life

Russell Crowe's losing streak continues. Tenderness is a movie about a
disturb boy and a sexually abused girl and their journey to Albany, NY
from Buffalo NY.

The film starts off with the young boy killing both of his parents and
being sentenced to a youth facility.

The boy gets released and tries to piece his life back together. The
girl lives with her mother who's boyfriend sexually molest her. She is
sexually abused and shows her bra covered breast to the store manager at
her job as he jerks off to avoid doing work.

When the boy is released the girl tracks him down and sneaks in his car
so that she could join him on his road trip. She is secretly in love
with him.

She knew of him before his incarceration and actually witnessed him
murder another teenage girl.

Russel Crowe plays a cop with a very sick wife who new mission in life
is to watch the boy like a hawk and make sure he doesn't kill anyone else.

Russel Crowe's character follows the boy on his road trip and alerts the
police along the way.

The boy met a female inmate while he was incarcerated and longs to see
her again. She lives up in Albany, NY. After he is released from jail he
sets out to meet her. But is the meeting a trap or just two lovebirds
trying to find each other outside of prison.

This movie is duller than dull and is missing character and plot
development. The pace is horrid.

I rate this film as 0.5 stars out of 4.0 stars

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Factory Girl
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/100aaf12cebb8e91
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 2:46 pm
From: PorchMonkey4Life

Prior to seeing this film I never heard of Edie Segwick. I saw a usenet
thread about her and bob dylan but didn't pay it any mind because I not
a huge dylan fan and I didn't know who edie was.

This film is a biopic about Edith Segwick and her interactions with Andy
Warhol and a dude named Billy Quinn who seemed to be a Bob Dylan-esque
type and her spiral into porn, prostition, drugs and depression.

Edie was sexually abused by her father for a number of years. When
shewas a girl she caught her father banging a neighbor or staff worker
she tells her mom. The mother doesn't believe her and the father has her
locked up in a mental hospital for a period of time.

He brother commits suicide and leaves her emotionally scarred. She
happens to meet Andy Warhol one night and they are immediately drawn to
one another. Edie worships Andy and Andy enjoys the attention. They go
on to collaborate on some trashy experimental films that Edie's father
disapproves of. Her father cuts her off financially and Edie must fend
for herself.

A mutual friend introduces her to a rock/folk star named Billy Quinn
(who seemed to be Bob Dylan but there is never an admission in the film
that Edie and Dylan knew each other. They use this ficticious character,
Quinn, to bridge the gap). Edie and Billy are quite taken with each
other and a love affair ensues.

Andy Warhol becomes quite jealous and cuts Edie off emotionally (since
he's gay and doesn't have heterosexual sex). Andy's mother is a weird
eastern block women that seems to have had a profound effect on Andy.

As Edie becomes torn between Quinn and Andy she experiences financial
difficulty and becomes a drug addict. She lets strange men shoot drugs
into her and film themselves having sex with her.

Quinn tires of Edie hanging around the "leech" Warhol and wants her to
choose him. She declines and he marries someone else and Edie falls
deeper into her depression and desperation.

The pace of the movie was good. the characters were interesting. the
setting was good. the soundtrack was good. the story was interesting.

I rate this film as a 3.0 out of 4.0 stars.

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 10:40 am
From: "RichA"

PorchMonkey4Life wrote:
> Prior to seeing this film I never heard of Edie Segwick. I saw a usenet
> thread about her and bob dylan but didn't pay it any mind because I not
> a huge dylan fan and I didn't know who edie was.
>
> This film is a biopic about Edith Segwick and her interactions with Andy
> Warhol and a dude named Billy Quinn who seemed to be a Bob Dylan-esque
> type and her spiral into porn, prostition, drugs and depression.
>
> Edie was sexually abused by her father for a number of years. When
> shewas a girl she caught her father banging a neighbor or staff worker
> she tells her mom. The mother doesn't believe her and the father has her
> locked up in a mental hospital for a period of time.
>
> He brother commits suicide and leaves her emotionally scarred. She
> happens to meet Andy Warhol one night and they are immediately drawn to
> one another. Edie worships Andy and Andy enjoys the attention. They go
> on to collaborate on some trashy experimental films that Edie's father
> disapproves of. Her father cuts her off financially and Edie must fend
> for herself.
>
> A mutual friend introduces her to a rock/folk star named Billy Quinn
> (who seemed to be Bob Dylan but there is never an admission in the film
> that Edie and Dylan knew each other. They use this ficticious character,
> Quinn, to bridge the gap). Edie and Billy are quite taken with each
> other and a love affair ensues.
>
> Andy Warhol becomes quite jealous and cuts Edie off emotionally (since
> he's gay and doesn't have heterosexual sex). Andy's mother is a weird
> eastern block women that seems to have had a profound effect on Andy.
>
> As Edie becomes torn between Quinn and Andy she experiences financial
> difficulty and becomes a drug addict. She lets strange men shoot drugs
> into her and film themselves having sex with her.
>
> Quinn tires of Edie hanging around the "leech" Warhol and wants her to
> choose him. She declines and he marries someone else and Edie falls
> deeper into her depression and desperation.
>
> The pace of the movie was good. the characters were interesting. the
> setting was good. the soundtrack was good. the story was interesting.
>
> I rate this film as a 3.0 out of 4.0 stars.

Boy, does THIS deviate from her biography in a BIG way.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: SNL HAS HIT ROCK BOTTOM WITH THIS EPISODE
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/51066fe6e7b868ea
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 8:02 am
From: "Jason Todd"

SyVyN11 wrote:
> "SNL hosts aren't funny" <spammiehunter@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1165725122.135826.298610@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > There are no words to describe how bad SNL has become tonight. Let us
> > watch this 1.5 hour train wreck with pure fascination.
> >
> > There are only 2 things that could save SNL now:
> >
> > 1-Kristen Wiig nudity
> >
> > 2-Dane hired as a feature player
> >
>
> Hey, Dunce Cokehead sock puppet! It's been six weeks, what have you been
> doing? Jerking off to dane cook?
>
> Don't tell us, we don't give a fuck.

You are correct, sir!

Basically, it looks like you and me disagree about politics and that's
about it.

I wonder if there's a word for that sort of thing?

Jason "DystoSimilarpinions???" Todd

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 9:19 am
From: "Will"

"SNL hosts aren't funny" <spammiehunter@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165725122.135826.298610@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> There are no words to describe how bad SNL has become tonight. Let us
> watch this 1.5 hour train wreck with pure fascination.
>
> There are only 2 things that could save SNL now:
>
> 1-Kristen Wiig nudity
>
> 2-Dane hired as a feature player
>

The funniest I ever saw Dane Cook was when he bombed big time at the MTV
Video awards. Seeing him look so uncomfortable while the crickets were
chirping was hilarious.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Airport security rules aren't for Sienna Miller
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/19fb2b62ac7e0db3
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 8:45 am
From: "Gossip Guy"

Pittsburgh-hater Sienna Miller was seen breaking a few rules at JFK
airport before a recent trip. A spy for the New York Post noticed
Sienna chatting away on her cell phone despite "signs be posted
everywhere" that cell phones are not allowed in Customs"

more: http://www.celebslam.com/sienna-miller-is-stupid

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Another Actress Slams Plastic Surgery
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/6ce533f32627d37c
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 9:01 am
From: azindn@gmail.com

Shannon York wrote:
> Titanic star Kate Winslet wants to grow old without the benefit of
> cosmetic surgery. Read more:
> http://www.carefair.com/html/Another_Actress_Slams_Plastic_Surgery_1262.html

Winslet is still young and everything is in the same place. When she
hits 40 and everything begins
to droop, sag, spread, and drop, she may have other thoughts on the
subject. British actors seem
to feel that plastic surgery is contrary to their craft. And, although
Hollywood's fixation with look young
and trout lipped is laughable, it is also true that subtle nips and
tucks are one way to keep working in
the industry she has chosen to earn a living.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Jay-Z and Beyonce are either breaking up or getting married
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/b3dc5230545b4288
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 9:08 am
From: azindn@gmail.com

Gossip Guy wrote:
> On his upcoming single "Lost One," rapper Jay-Z leaves fans
> wondering if his relationship with longtime girlfriend Beyoncé Knowles
> is over ("I don't think it's meant to be, B/For she loves the
> work more than she does me"). However, other news outlets are reporting
> that the "surprise" 37th birthday party Beyoncé is throwing for
> Jay-Z next week is in fact a secret wedding.
>
> from: http://www.celebslam.com/jay-z-beyonce-break-split

What is so surprise about a party that is talked about on a NG?
Beyonce, quit giving it away if ya want that ugly man to propose.
Or, get your mama after him with a shotgun and a preacher in tow.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Rain with Difference
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/3e2cc3c30e3a8f54
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 9:19 am
From: "Akhil"

http://haw-haw.blogspot.com/2006/12/rain-during-war.html

Regards
Akhil Bansal

==============================================================================
TOPIC: LA Times: Carter: AIPAC's "extraordinary lobbying efforts"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/1707fc5135f7bdee
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 2:04 pm
From: "PolicySpy"

> Speaking frankly about Israel and Palestine
> Jimmy Carter says his recent book is drawing knee-jerk accusations of
> anti-Israel bias.
> By Jimmy Carter
> the 39th president of the United States. His newest book is "Palestine:
> Peace Not Apartheid," published last month. He is scheduled to sign
> books Monday at Vroman's in Pasadena.
> December 8, 2006
> I signed a contract with Simon & Schuster two years ago to write a book
> about the Middle East, based on my personal observations as the Carter
> Center monitored three elections in Palestine and on my consultations
> with Israeli political leaders and peace activists.
> We covered every Palestinian community in 1996, 2005 and 2006, when

The Republicans support Israel to have a strategic ally in the Middle East.
The Democrats support Israel because most U.S. Jewish people are Democrats.
We all support Israel because it is a rich and impressive society.

But...Jewish immigration to Israel is recognizable as another page in the
long history of European colonialism.

And the historical pattern of colonialism is that the colonists improve
infrastructure, social systems, and markets...and then face pressure from
local or regional demographics.

Of course the creation of the Jewish state by the UN was one of the
solutions to the end of WWII...

==============================================================================
TOPIC: **E! Online BLIND ITEMS 12/10**
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/8e63f980760a2166
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 11:20 am
From: "Lili2"

E! ONLINE/Kristin Veitch 12/06
http://snipurl.com/131lb

--Once upon a time, Nelly was supposed to be a leading lady of a
certain show we talk about pretty often here at WWK Central. She was
sexy, driven, edgy and seemingly perfect for the part-but as it
turned out, she couldn't act her way out of even the most simply
crafted scene. Her one-note performance drove the producers a little
nuts, so they soon began plotting her death. When the death scene
actually went down, the cast and crew gathered together for a party,
and when Nelly bit the dust, the room broke out in raucous cheers.

--This one is short but not sweet. A certain TV star we all love once
text-messaged me (yes, me, your lowly couch potato) at 2 a.m.: "Are we
gonna fick or what?" It was from a BlackBerry that had both the "I" and
"U" on the same key, and I'm proud to say (especially if my fiancé is
listening) that I promptly replied: "Fick you!" (Hmmm...Or was there an
"I'll" before that message? Anyway, you get the gist.)

==============================================================================
TOPIC: **Grazia UK BLIND ITEMS 12/10**
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/browse_thread/thread/5b4f5068cf180058
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Dec 10 2006 11:21 am
From: "Lili2"

>From Grazia, a British glossy weekly.
http://www.graziamagazine.co.uk/nav?page=grazia

--Which lead singer of a very hot band was caught getting a blow job
from a fan in the toilets of a pub? Not sure what his girlfriend would
think if she found out about it...

--Which US singing starlet is trying to hide her burgeoning drug habit
from the rest of her celebrity family? This wannabe is starting to mix
with club-hopping cokeheads on both sides of the Atlantic and is
breaking away from her dull wholesome image big time.

--A diminuative, unmarried Hollywood heart-throb - whose career seems
to have stalled of late - stands accused of sending death threats to
the new squeeze of one of his ex-girlfriends. It seems the actor just
can't bear the idea of her getting it on with another man, so has been
regularly calling to warn off his replacement. The phrase 'Get a life'
springs to mind.

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.showbiz.gossip"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.showbiz.gossip-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.showbiz.gossip/subscribe

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com

photo

Sunday, December 10, 2006

25 new messages in 17 topics - digest

0 Comments:

About Me

Previous Posts